Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05640
Original file (BC 2012 05640.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05640
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 Nov 12, be removed from the 
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

During the sit-up portion of his FA, he removed his hand from 
his chest to adjust his waistband because his military ID card 
was causing pain with each repetition and this caused him to 
fail his FA.

His squadron commander authorized him to retest.  On 19 Nov 12, 
he passed all portions of his test.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
Individual Fitness Assessment History Report from the AFFMS, and 
memorandums requesting to retest and authorizing the retest.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of airman first class.

The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows:

	DATE	SCORE

	19 Nov 12	SATISFACTORY
*	15 Nov 12	UNSATISFACTORY
	23 May 12	SATISFACTORY
	23 May 11	EXCELLENT

*Contested FA score.

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states that the applicant 
took his FA on 15 Nov 12 scoring a composite score of 76.10; he 
received an unsatisfactory due to failing to complete the 
required number of sit-ups.  The applicant’s commander 
authorized the applicant to retest four days later, and he 
achieved a score of 83.40, a satisfactory score.

AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, Air Force Guidance Memorandum 
(AFGM) 4, paragraph 9, states that “When conducting sit-ups, 
members will cross arms over the chest so that part of the 
hands/fingers remains [sic] in contact with the shoulders or 
upper chest at all times.” 

The applicant’s sit-up component was terminated as a result of 
him removing his hands from his shoulders.  While it is 
understandable the adjustment was required to alleviate pain, 
the AFI does not provide for this action—the guidance 
specifically indicates that hands must maintain contact with the 
shoulders or chest at all times during the assessment.

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 17 Feb 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice warranting partial 
relief.  The applicant contends he removed his hands from his 
chest during the sit-up portion of his test to adjust his ID 
card and this caused him to fail his FA.  Although the AFI 
requires that your hands/fingers must maintain contact with your 
shoulders or chest at all times during the sit-up component of 
an FA, since the applicant’s commander approved a waiver to 
allow him to retest and he achieved a passing score, we believe 
he has provided sufficient evidence to raise reasonable doubt as 
to the validity of this component of the 15 Nov 12 FA.  While 
the applicant is requesting that his entire FA be removed, we do 
not find sufficient evidence the results of the other components 
are in error or unjust, or were administered incorrectly.  
Therefore, we recommend that the sit-up component of his 15 Nov 
12 FA be updated to reflect exempt in the AFFMS.  Accordingly, 
we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated 
below.  

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the sit-
up component of his Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 Nov 12, be 
amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management 
System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05640 in Executive Session on 17 Sep 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Nov 12, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 2 Feb 13, w/atch.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02064

    Original file (BC 2013 02064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove FA score from AFFMS dated 28 Aug 12. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05369

    Original file (BC 2012 05369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states that the applicant provided a memorandum from the Director, Fitness and Sports Complex at Kadena Air Base, Japan which states her staff was aware of the manufacturer’s guidance that HR monitors can cause erratic readings and have previously separated walkers after crossing the finish line to keep their distance to avoid syncing with other HR monitors worn by other walkers. After he completed the cardio component of the FA, he had a 20 minute argument with three of the FACs and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02524

    Original file (BC 2013 02524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This will count as one sit-up.” The applicant’s last 3 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-ups Rating 22 Mar 2013 94.80 49 Excellent *05 Mar 2013 85.30 39 Unsatisfactory 05 Mar 2012 93.70 47 Excellent *Contested FA On 16 Oct 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically witness statement to support injustice.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05042

    Original file (BC-2011-05042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the AFBCMR approve the applicant’s request to void the contested report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03686

    Original file (BC-2012-03686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03686 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) test score dated 23 Apr 12, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Upon taking the retest, the applicant was again successful in completing his FA as he was in many occasions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03686

    Original file (BC 2012 03686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03686 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) test score dated 23 Apr 12, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Upon taking the retest, the applicant was again successful in completing his FA as he was in many occasions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779

    Original file (BC-2012-05779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04796

    Original file (BC-2012-04796.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04796 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 April 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the applicant be exempt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04477

    Original file (BC 2013 04477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She took another FA on 16 September 2011, receiving a score of 82.10, failing the sit-up component of the FA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 September...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465

    Original file (BC 2013 01465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...